Menarik!!!…Kenyataan oleh bekas peguam yang terbabit di pihak Anwar Ibrahim dalam Liwat II, Yuktes Vijay yang mendedahkan kisah sebenar apa yang terjadi (di sebelah pihak pembelaan Anwar) semasa kes dibicarakan…
Selama ini kita tahu bahawa para peguam Melayu/Islam Anwar Ibrahim melarikan diri daripada membela beliau. Sebab itu semasa Liwat II, hampir tidak ada langsung peguam Melayu/Islam yang mahu mewakili Anwar Ibrahim.
Mungkin mereka tahu sesuatu yang menyebabkan mereka malas nak mewakili Anwar.
Takpe…itu kisah lama.
Kali ini, seorang peguam India pula yang nyata sudah bosan dan jemu serta marah yang teramat dengan perangai Anwar, tampil membuat pelbagai pendedahan.
Yuktes Vijay adalah peguam yang terbabit secara langsung dalam Liwat II bagi pihak Anwar Ibrahim.
Yuktes berkerja dengan salah seorang peguam Anwar dan beliau melakukan semua kerja-kerja penyelidikan dan mencari bahan untuk mempertahankan Anwar.
Beliau telah menghantar email ke sebuah portal berita menceritakan rasa bosannya melihat sikap bermuka-muka Anwar dalam isu Liwat II.
Beliau antaranya sangat kecewa kerana Anwar Ibrahim dan Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR) sanggup merendahkan diri ke tahap yang begitu hina apabila mempergunakan bapa Saiful untuk faedah mereka.
Yuktes memberitahu, ketika perbicaraan, Anwar sebenarnya gentar untuk memberikan pengakuan dan bersoal-jawab di kandang saksi. Anwar bimbang dengan soalan-soalan yang mungkin ditanya barisan pendakwaraya.
Dalam email berkenaan, Yuktes turut melontarkan beberapa persoalan yang menghantui dirinya dan mahukan para penyokong Pakatan Rakyat bertanya sendiri kepada Anwar untuk mendapatkan jawapan.
Antaranya:
-Mengapa Anwar secara spesifik dan secara peribadi meminta Ketua Kakitangannya, Ibrahim Yaakob menghantar Saiful ke apartment (di mana liwat didakwa berlaku) membawa dokumen sedangkan ada kakitangan yang lain untuk berbuat demikian.
-Bagaimana Saiful tahu kod untuk masuk ke apartmen itu adalah Mokhtar, yakni nama Ketua Keselamatan dan adik ipar Anwar?
-Bukti video yang dihantar ke Makmal Ghandi di New Delhi mengesahkan kehadiran Saiful di apartmen berkenaan, jadi bagaimana kehadiran Saiful di sana boleh dipersoalkan?
-Mengapa Saiful diberikan layanan istimewa seperti bilik sendiri, keistimewaan untuk mengikuti Anwar dalam lawatan ke luar negara walaupun Saiful adalah kakitangan baru?
-Pembantu khas Anwar kini, Najwan Halimi pernah menghantar email kepada Anwar memaklumkan kesetiaan dan sayangnya kepada Barisan Nasional (BN), kenapa Anwar tidak pedulikan hal berkenaan?.
Menyedari Anwar tidak mampu bertahan soalan-soalan bertalu daripada pihak pendakwaraya, pasukan peguambela memutuskan untuk Anwar agar tidak memberikan sebarang keterangan atas alasan beliau tidak diberikan perbicaraan yang adil.
Anwar berjaya dalam menipu (conning, deceiving and cheating) masyarakat dengan membawa watak yang menyerupai Mandela (Nelson Mandela). Beliau bukan Mandela, tetapi penipu yang hebat, katanya.
Peguam berkenaan juga mempersoalkan siapa yang membayar satu jumlah yang sangat besar kepada dua pakar luar negara iaitu Dr Brian Macdonald dan Dr David Wells yang bercakap bagi pihak Anwar semasa perbicaraan.
Yuktes kata beliau tahu identiti seseorang bergelar Datuk yang membayar untuk semua perbelanjaan berkenaan yang bukan sedikit jumlahnya dan Anwar tidak mengeluarkan satu sen pun duit beliau. Yuran guaman juga dibayar oleh Datuk berkenaan katanya.
Beliau walaupun mengetahui siapa Datuk yang menampung semua perbelanjaan Anwar, pada peringkat ini memilih untuk merahsiakannya.
“Masalahnya ialah jika PKR boleh melontar soalan seperti siapa membiyai perbelanjaan perkahwinan anak perempuan Perdana Menteri, mengapa tidak persoalan dari mana jumlah wang yang besar untuk membayar pakar-pakar berkenaan datang? Jika seorang bekas banduan yang sekadar Ketua Pembangkang boleh menggunakan Datuk untuk membayar yuram guamannya, apa salahnya kalau ada Datuk yang hendak bayar perbelanjaan perkahwinan anak perempuan Perdana Menteri,” soalnya secara analogi.
Mengenai Saiful
Berkaitan dengan mangsa liwat, Saiful pula, Yuktes tidak tahu banyak mengenai anak muda berkenaan.
“Satu benda yang boleh saya katakan ialah beliau dinafikan keadilan akibat Pengawai Penyiasat, Jude Perreira, mengabaikan protokol yang diberitahu Jabatan Kimia kepada beliau dan kemudian memutuskan untuk buat kerja ikut gaya sendiri.
“Memang ada DNA Anwar dalam dubur Saiful. Satu-satunya perkara yang menghalang Hakim daripada mensabitkan Anwar adalah rantaian bukti berkenaan terputus (akibat sikap bodoh pengawai penyiasat),” katanya.
Peguam berkenaan berulang kali menegaskan bahawa air mani Anwar ada dalam bubur Saiful namun disebabkan rantaian bukti yang terputus serta persoalan mengenai intergriti sampel yang diperoleh, bukti kukuh berkenaan terpaksa diketepikan.
Peguam berkenaan bagaimanapun berjanji akan menulis lebih lanjut dan lebih menyeluruh mengenai isu penolakan bukti yang kukuh berkenaan dalam email yang akan datang.
APA YANG MENARIK….PEGUAM ITU MAHUKAN ANWAR MENYAMANNYA ATAS PENDEDAHAN BERHUBUNG LIWAT II…DIA BERKATA DIA TIDAK SABAR UNTUK BERTEMU ANWAR DI MAHKAMAH BERHUBUNG ISU INI.
Di bawah adalah kenyataan asal Yuktes yang dikarang dalam bahasa Inggeris.
LETTER: From Yuktes Vijay, via e-mail
I read with anger the news that Saiful’s dad has joined PKR. I knew from Day 1 that the party was devoid of any integrity but for it to stoop to this extent is just mind boggling. I was working with one of Anwar’s long-time lawyers during the whole course of Sodomy 2 and was involved in A-Z of the trial itself.
When I say A-Z, it means from meeting the forensic and DNA experts to reviewing of the documents to finding case laws for his submissions. I was involved in everything. I do not wish to mention the name of the lawyer here as I revere him as my mentor and I do not wish to drag him into this frustration and anger pouring of mine.
Why Anwar never took the stand?
Anwar claimed that he was never offered a fair trial. The truth is he was never brave enough to take the stand. He was never going to withstand the questions that were about to be put forward to his now ally Datuk Yusof. If you Pakatanians have doubts, why not ask him these questions and get valid, acceptable and not logically challenging answers for it.
Why did Anwar personally and specifically request his Chief of Staff, Ibrahim Yaakob to send Saiful to the apartment carrying documents when there were other staff there;
How come Saiful was aware of the code to enter the apartment which was ‘Mokhtar’, the name of Anwar’s security chief and brother-in-law? ;
Video evidence that was sent to Gandhi Labs in New Delhi confirmed the presence of Saiful in the apartment, so how can Saiful’s presence in the apartment be refuted;
Why was Saiful afforded special treatment i.e. he was given his own room, privilege of following Anwar for overseas trips though he was a new staff;
Anwar’s current aide, Najwan Halimi had previously e-mailed Anwar and told him about Saiful’s apparent afflictions to BN. Why was the call not heeded by Anwar?
Fearing that Anwar will not be able to withstand the onslaught by the Prosecution, the defence team then decided to ask him not to take stand uder the pretext that he was not offered a fair trial. Anwar excelled in conning, deceiving and cheating the public by assuming a Mandela like persona. He is no Mandela, merely a good con artist.
Fund for the overseas experts
The surprising factor here is why no one has ever questioned the fees that were involved in paying the forensic experts, Dr Brian Macdonald and Dr David Wells. Contrary to what the general public have been made to believe, they were paid hefty sums to defend him. When they were here, they stayed in Shang-ri La Hotel for a number of days.
Where did the money to pay the hotels come from? Did Anwar pay from his own pocket? No, he does not even pay his lawyers. So, he had very rich Datuks funding him. I do know the name of the Datuk, but for the reasons known close to me I will not disclose the name.
The problem is if PKR can throw questions as to the wedding expenditure of the Prime Minister, why not question where the money to pay these experts came from? If a former convict and a mere Opposition Leader can have Datuks funding his legal expences, what is wrong in having Datuks funding the wedding of the PM’s daughter?
Saiful
I don’t know much about Saiful. The only thing I can say is that the reason he was denied justice is that the Investigating Officer, Jude Perreira, ignored the protocols told to him by Jabatan Kimia and decided to do his things his own way.
There were traces of Anwar’s DNA in his rectum. The only thing that stopped the judge from convicting Anwar was the “break in the chain of evidence”. I will write a full piece on this soon. This drama itself deserves a full piece write up.
In a nutshell, there was evidence of Anwar’s semen in Saiful’s rectum. However, due to a break in chain of evidence and the question mark over the integrity of the samples, the evidence was not used.
So the judge had no other way of corroborating Saiful’s evidence.
Conclusion for Part 1
Anwar is a consummate liar. He is using Saiful’s dad to play up his victim role in order to garner votes. We all know for a fact that since he got acquitted he has lost that bit of “charm” about him as he has nothing to yell about anymore. I really hope he sues me so that I can prove in Court what I have just mentioned.
Remember Anwar Ibrahim, I grew up adoring you. I know your modus operandi and I aspired to be you. Sue me please. Let the public watch Anwar vs Anwar clone (which is me) in action. And remember the e-mails, Astroboy? I have all of them saved. Come get me!
The writer, a former Anwarista, worked in Anwar’s Sodomy 2 trial for the defence – FMT
sumber Mynewshub
.jpg)
No comments:
Post a Comment